F*ck Content
Michael Rock
Visual Interpretation
This publication is an interpretation of Michael Rock's "F*ck Content" article. I interpreted his article by showing that one can still have a good design without the content being anything meaningful, by using random elements from every day life that don't have a particular meaning but are used as visual/graphic elements, solely for the purpose of creating a dynamic composition. I am agreeing with Michael Rock by showing that graphic design is not only a vessel that contains information and depends on other fields in order to have a purpose. Graphic design can exist independently from other fields.
"Good content is [never ever] the measure of good design."
"Our content is, perpetually, Design itself."
